Associated People (3) |
The dates listed below have different categories as denoted by the letters in the brackets following each date. Here is a key to explain those letter codes:
|
1817 [EA] - 1821 [LA] → Owner
|
1817 [EA] - 1817 [LA] → Attorney
Acting attorney |
1824 [EA] - 1828 [LA] → Previous owner
|
Notes |
Almost certainly the estate shown as 'Diamond' in the compensation records. |
Estate Information (5) |
1817
[Number of enslaved people] 93(Tot)
[Name] None given Rd. Burgh Byam, acting attorney in the absence of Martin William Byam, attorney of William Martin Esq. Inferred to be Martin's.
T71/245 350-352
|
1821
[Number of enslaved people] 92(Tot)
[Name] None given Martin W. Byam atty of William Martin Esq. Inferred to be Martin's.
T71/246 101-104
|
1824
[Number of enslaved people] 86(Tot)
[Name] Martin's James Syret atty of the executors of the late William Martin Esq.
T71/248 703-704
|
1828
[Number of enslaved people] 84(Tot)
[Name] Martin's James Syret atty of the executors of the late William Martin Esq. The estate is identified as Martin's in the affidavit.
T71/249 513-514
|
1832
[Name] None given
By 1832, Francis Frye Brown had purchased 84 people late the property of William Martin. Francis Frye Brown was awarded compensation for the Diamond estate which does not appear in the Slave Registers. It appears likely that Diamond was a continuation of Martin's.
T71/250 98-99
|